The Kerala High Court has sharply criticised a group of newly added petitioners in the ongoing proceedings related to Kerala Story 2 after they allegedly made remarks questioning the integrity of members of the judiciary.
During the hearing, the court observed that the statements made by the petitioners cast doubts on the impartiality of the judges handling the case. The bench said such allegations undermine the dignity of the judicial institution and warned that making claims against judges without credible evidence is unacceptable.
The judges emphasised that while litigants have every right to challenge judicial orders through proper legal channels, personal accusations against members of the judiciary cross a serious line. The court noted that reckless allegations could weaken public confidence in the justice system.
The issue arose when the new petitioners sought to intervene in the matter concerning Kerala Story 2. While presenting their submissions, they reportedly included statements that the court considered disparaging toward the judges.
Responding firmly, the bench reminded the petitioners and their counsel that criticism of court orders must remain within the framework of law and maintain respect for the institution. The court also underlined that the judiciary operates on principles of independence and fairness, and any attempt to question these principles without solid evidence is a grave matter.
The High Court cautioned that if such conduct continues, it could lead to legal consequences.
Legal experts point out that courts in India have consistently taken a strict view of statements that may amount to contempt or harm the reputation of the judiciary. While parties are free to question rulings through legal arguments, courts expect the focus to remain on legal issues rather than personal allegations against judges.
The proceedings in the Kerala Story 2 case will continue, with the High Court making it clear that it will not allow attempts to undermine the credibility of the judicial process. The bench reiterated that maintaining respect for institutions is essential for upholding the rule of law while allowing legitimate legal debate.
