March 11, 2026 : The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation seeking directions to conduct research on whether onions and garlic contain “tamasic” or negative elements, sharply criticising the petitioner for filing what it described as a frivolous plea. The Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant cautioned the petitioner against bringing similar matters before the Court in the future, observing that such petitions unnecessarily consume valuable judicial time.

The petition was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by an advocate appearing in person. It sought the constitution of a committee to study whether onion and garlic possess negative or tamasic qualities. The plea drew from beliefs held in certain communities, particularly among Jains, who traditionally avoid onion, garlic, and certain root vegetables in their diet.

During the hearing, the petitioner attempted to justify the issue by referring to a matrimonial dispute that was allegedly linked to the use of onions in food. The Court, however, expressed strong disapproval and questioned the basis of the litigation.

Chief Justice Surya Kant asked the petitioner why he wanted to raise an issue that could hurt the sentiments of the Jain community. The Bench noted that bringing such matters without a clear legal foundation diverts the Court’s attention from genuine and pressing cases.

In its order, the Court dismissed the petition along with three other PILs filed by the same petitioner, observing that the pleas were vague, poorly drafted, and lacked any substantive legal basis.