Wednesday, 14 October, 2026

Tag: CESTAT Allahabad


Customs, Excise and Servive Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

May 19, 2026 : The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has set aside a service tax demand exceeding Rs.77 crore raised against Samsung Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. in a long-running dispute concerning payments made in Read more…


Customs, Excise and Servive Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

May 14, 2026 : The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a customs duty demand of over ₹10.22 crore raised against Delhi-based importer M/s Uttam Steel Alloys Pvt. Ltd., holding that electronic evidence such Read more…


CESTAT _ Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal _ LawNotify

March 30, 2026 : The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that service tax cannot be levied merely on the basis of invoices raised prior to completion of services, particularly where the services were Read more…


CESTAT _ Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal _ LawNotify

March 24, 2026 : The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand against M/s Ganpati Transport Service, holding that a demand founded solely on Income Tax return (ITR) Read more…


February 19, 2026 : The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that an appeal cannot be dismissed as time-barred merely on the assumption that an order was served, when the Department fails Read more…


February 03, 2026 : The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that an assessee cannot claim interest at 12 percent on excise refunds as a matter of right, holding that interest on delayed Read more…


February 01, 2026 : The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has quashed a service tax demand of ₹10.35 lakh along with interest and penalties raised against M/s Protectwell Security Services, holding that the extended Read more…