1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
April 27, 2026 : The Supreme Court of India has upheld a decision of the Bombay High Court affirming that company directors can still be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 even after the company’s debt has been resolved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
A Bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan declined to interfere with the High Court’s ruling, dismissing the Special Leave Petition while leaving all other legal contentions open for adjudication before the trial court.
The case arose from a loan of ₹15 lakh advanced by the complainant to the accused. A post-dated cheque issued by one of the directors, acting as an authorized signatory of the company, was dishonoured, leading to proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act. Subsequently, the company entered liquidation in April 2019.
The trial court had discharged the directors on the ground that they ceased to hold their positions after liquidation and therefore could not be held liable. However, the High Court overturned this finding, holding that insolvency proceedings do not absolve directors of criminal liability under Section 138.
The High Court clarified several key legal principles:
Endorsing these findings, the Supreme Court reinforced that insolvency resolution does not shield individuals from prosecution for cheque dishonour.
Case Reference : Abhaykumar Anandkumar Bhambore & Anr. v. Ortho Relief Hospital and Research Centre & Anr.